A A KINGSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

103

29%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

34

24%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

58

30%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

96

29%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

55

45%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

152
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.