Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN F KENNEDY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

105

33%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

45

83%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.