HERMON-DEKALB CENTRAL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

20

26%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

39

43%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

19

83%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

16

64%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

22

40%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

44

40%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

38

33%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.