GOUVERNEUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

238

48%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

74

15%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

328

52%

LEVEL 2

189

30%

LEVEL 3

96

15%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

106

46%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

149

49%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

132

51%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

179

55%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

230

48%

LEVEL 2

151

32%

LEVEL 3

72

15%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

322

52%

LEVEL 2

185

30%

LEVEL 3

96

15%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

171

41%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

245

45%

LEVEL 2

179

33%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

67

92%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

83

88%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

234

48%

LEVEL 2

154

32%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

175

55%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

98
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

234

48%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

74

15%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

116
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

318

51%

LEVEL 2

186

30%

LEVEL 3

94

15%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

96
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

231

49%

LEVEL 2

147

31%

LEVEL 3

71

15%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

113
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

324

52%

LEVEL 2

183

30%

LEVEL 3

91

15%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

224

47%

LEVEL 2

150

32%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

310

51%

LEVEL 2

184

30%

LEVEL 3

96

16%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

18

78%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.