Skip to Content
Main content

CANTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

94

21%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

149

33%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

138

29%

LEVEL 3

154

33%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

92

22%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

100

23%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

146

34%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

48

12%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

46

70%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

51

69%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

223
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

129

29%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

222
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

102

22%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

220
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

146

34%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

103

22%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

154

33%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.