Skip to Content
Main content

CHERRY LANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

56

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

46

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

37

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

31

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

20

40%

LEVEL 4

19

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

22

49%

LEVEL 4

15

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

13

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

37

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

24

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

39

34%

LEVEL 4

55

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

37

35%

LEVEL 4

46

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

56

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

39

37%

LEVEL 4

46

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

46

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

37

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.