PEARL RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

144

34%

LEVEL 4

144

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

85

19%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

159

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

36

17%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

83

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

73

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

76

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

17

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

116

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

126

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

143

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

142

36%

LEVEL 4

158

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

31

66%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

285
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

144

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

304
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

145

34%

LEVEL 4

159

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

72

19%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

133

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

271
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

78

20%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

146

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

21

36%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

284
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

85

20%

LEVEL 3

141

33%

LEVEL 4

143

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

301
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

52

12%

LEVEL 2

85

19%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

158

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.