Skip to Content
Main content

VALLEY COTTAGE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

83

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

83

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

31

37%

LEVEL 4

37

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

38

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

46

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

45

47%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

16

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

40

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

34

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

19

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

11

20%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

80

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

82

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

83

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

83

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

69

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

69

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.