UPPER NYACK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

64

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

74

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

37

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

29

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

27

40%

LEVEL 4

27

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

45

51%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

10

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

43

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

52

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

7

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

64

45%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

72

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

59

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

69

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.