JAMES A FARLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

113

38%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

107

32%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

54

40%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

27

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

80

47%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

31

84%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

29

71%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

79

30%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

34

87%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

33

75%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

83

49%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.