HAVERSTRAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

180

52%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

199

52%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

94

58%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

88

51%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

86

46%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

111

53%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

130

56%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

144

59%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

157

50%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

174

50%

LEVEL 2

75

21%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

89

89%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

98

92%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

19

21%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

161

62%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

160

58%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.