NANUET UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

436
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

103

15%

LEVEL 2

167

24%

LEVEL 3

219

31%

LEVEL 4

217

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

431
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 753

LEVEL 1

113

15%

LEVEL 2

209

28%

LEVEL 3

234

31%

LEVEL 4

197

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

227
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

120

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

102

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

209
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

97

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

216
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

95

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

99
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

60

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

103
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

59

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

105

34%

LEVEL 4

106

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

89

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

11

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

417
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

53

9%

LEVEL 2

150

24%

LEVEL 3

206

33%

LEVEL 4

211

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

65

10%

LEVEL 2

191

29%

LEVEL 3

220

33%

LEVEL 4

187

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

50

58%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

48

53%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

423
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

151

24%

LEVEL 3

208

32%

LEVEL 4

215

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

425
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

190

27%

LEVEL 3

231

33%

LEVEL 4

194

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

35

55%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

32

56%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

110

21%

LEVEL 3

168

33%

LEVEL 4

192

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

349
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

51

9%

LEVEL 2

139

26%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

177

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.