Skip to Content
Main content

CARROLL HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

100

56%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

97

51%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

39

48%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

49

53%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

58

54%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

38

54%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

37

57%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

65

47%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

59

41%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

35

90%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

94

63%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

90

55%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

91

55%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

87

51%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.