TROY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

446

57%

LEVEL 2

179

23%

LEVEL 3

106

14%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 799

LEVEL 1

437

55%

LEVEL 2

179

22%

LEVEL 3

102

13%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

202

53%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

210

52%

LEVEL 2

88

22%

LEVEL 3

54

13%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

244

61%

LEVEL 2

88

22%

LEVEL 3

42

10%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

227

57%

LEVEL 2

91

23%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

24

52%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

144

44%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

124

40%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

189

72%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

181

68%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

87

65%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

100

67%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

321

50%

LEVEL 2

168

26%

LEVEL 3

102

16%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

321

48%

LEVEL 2

160

24%

LEVEL 3

101

15%

LEVEL 4

81

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

125

89%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

116

85%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

156
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

425

56%

LEVEL 2

178

23%

LEVEL 3

105

14%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 779

LEVEL 1

423

54%

LEVEL 2

175

22%

LEVEL 3

100

13%

LEVEL 4

81

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

389

66%

LEVEL 2

119

20%

LEVEL 3

62

11%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 661

LEVEL 1

393

59%

LEVEL 2

147

22%

LEVEL 3

70

11%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

404

56%

LEVEL 2

171

24%

LEVEL 3

101

14%

LEVEL 4

50

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 758

LEVEL 1

404

53%

LEVEL 2

176

23%

LEVEL 3

97

13%

LEVEL 4

81

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

42

75%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.