LANSINGBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 882

LEVEL 1

446

51%

LEVEL 2

231

26%

LEVEL 3

143

16%

LEVEL 4

62

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,009

LEVEL 1

483

48%

LEVEL 2

254

25%

LEVEL 3

183

18%

LEVEL 4

89

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

188

48%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

204

45%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

258

52%

LEVEL 2

122

25%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

279

51%

LEVEL 2

122

22%

LEVEL 3

108

20%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

47

48%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

50

53%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

220

44%

LEVEL 2

133

27%

LEVEL 3

99

20%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

249

42%

LEVEL 2

157

27%

LEVEL 3

118

20%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

96

63%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

94

53%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

81

65%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

86

63%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

316

43%

LEVEL 2

209

29%

LEVEL 3

140

19%

LEVEL 4

62

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 827

LEVEL 1

330

40%

LEVEL 2

233

28%

LEVEL 3

176

21%

LEVEL 4

88

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

130

84%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

153

84%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

203
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 852

LEVEL 1

426

50%

LEVEL 2

223

26%

LEVEL 3

141

17%

LEVEL 4

62

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

272
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 985

LEVEL 1

464

47%

LEVEL 2

249

25%

LEVEL 3

183

19%

LEVEL 4

89

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

19

79%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

388

57%

LEVEL 2

163

24%

LEVEL 3

95

14%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

404

54%

LEVEL 2

193

26%

LEVEL 3

116

15%

LEVEL 4

41

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

203
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 867

LEVEL 1

437

50%

LEVEL 2

227

26%

LEVEL 3

141

16%

LEVEL 4

62

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

262
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 952

LEVEL 1

452

47%

LEVEL 2

238

25%

LEVEL 3

175

18%

LEVEL 4

87

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.