GREEN MEADOW SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

64

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

64

39%

LEVEL 4

59

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

34

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

34

43%

LEVEL 4

27

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

30

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

32

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

52

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

54

43%

LEVEL 4

44

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

62

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

58

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

52

40%

LEVEL 4

49

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.