Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

27

68%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

22

56%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

61

40%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

61

38%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.