Skip to Content
Main content

RED MILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

73

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

113

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

36

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

41

38%

LEVEL 4

51

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

37

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

62

60%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

7

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

11

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

62

41%

LEVEL 4

60

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

87

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

72

40%

LEVEL 4

73

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

112

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

57

40%

LEVEL 4

63

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

91

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

22

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

73

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.