Skip to Content
Main content

HOWARD L GOFF SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

94

14%

LEVEL 2

197

29%

LEVEL 3

213

32%

LEVEL 4

169

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

442
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

103

14%

LEVEL 2

196

26%

LEVEL 3

243

33%

LEVEL 4

199

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

184
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

237
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

110

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

198
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

94

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

14

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

21

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

320
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

152

28%

LEVEL 3

179

33%

LEVEL 4

141

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

359
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

156

26%

LEVEL 3

202

34%

LEVEL 4

157

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

206

36%

LEVEL 4

164

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

427
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

166

26%

LEVEL 3

231

37%

LEVEL 4

196

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

61

60%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

66

59%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

381
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 668

LEVEL 1

92

14%

LEVEL 2

195

29%

LEVEL 3

212

32%

LEVEL 4

169

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

441
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

99

14%

LEVEL 2

193

26%

LEVEL 3

243

33%

LEVEL 4

198

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

322
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

141

28%

LEVEL 3

173

34%

LEVEL 4

149

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

368
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

137

25%

LEVEL 3

200

36%

LEVEL 4

168

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

380
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 668

LEVEL 1

94

14%

LEVEL 2

194

29%

LEVEL 3

212

32%

LEVEL 4

168

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.