Skip to Content
Main content

OSWEGO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

516
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,335

LEVEL 1

451

34%

LEVEL 2

368

28%

LEVEL 3

324

24%

LEVEL 4

192

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

600
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,558

LEVEL 1

513

33%

LEVEL 2

445

29%

LEVEL 3

373

24%

LEVEL 4

227

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

230
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

218

34%

LEVEL 2

194

30%

LEVEL 3

134

21%

LEVEL 4

96

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

278
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 780

LEVEL 1

265

34%

LEVEL 2

237

30%

LEVEL 3

172

22%

LEVEL 4

106

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

286
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

233

34%

LEVEL 2

174

25%

LEVEL 3

190

27%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

322
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

248

32%

LEVEL 2

208

27%

LEVEL 3

201

26%

LEVEL 4

121

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

468
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,186

LEVEL 1

394

33%

LEVEL 2

324

27%

LEVEL 3

293

25%

LEVEL 4

175

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

548
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,378

LEVEL 1

441

32%

LEVEL 2

389

28%

LEVEL 3

341

25%

LEVEL 4

207

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

27

39%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

38

46%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

497
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,120

LEVEL 1

300

27%

LEVEL 2

323

29%

LEVEL 3

311

28%

LEVEL 4

186

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

574
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,286

LEVEL 1

317

25%

LEVEL 2

395

31%

LEVEL 3

354

28%

LEVEL 4

220

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

151

70%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

196

72%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

511
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,311

LEVEL 1

437

33%

LEVEL 2

363

28%

LEVEL 3

322

25%

LEVEL 4

189

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

593
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,525

LEVEL 1

496

33%

LEVEL 2

436

29%

LEVEL 3

370

24%

LEVEL 4

223

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

316
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

111

19%

LEVEL 2

144

25%

LEVEL 3

190

33%

LEVEL 4

126

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

357
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

132

20%

LEVEL 2

182

27%

LEVEL 3

213

32%

LEVEL 4

144

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 764

LEVEL 1

340

45%

LEVEL 2

224

29%

LEVEL 3

134

18%

LEVEL 4

66

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 887

LEVEL 1

381

43%

LEVEL 2

263

30%

LEVEL 3

160

18%

LEVEL 4

83

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

514
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,328

LEVEL 1

449

34%

LEVEL 2

365

27%

LEVEL 3

323

24%

LEVEL 4

191

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

599
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,551

LEVEL 1

512

33%

LEVEL 2

440

28%

LEVEL 3

372

24%

LEVEL 4

227

15%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

501
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,269

LEVEL 1

419

33%

LEVEL 2

349

28%

LEVEL 3

311

25%

LEVEL 4

190

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

586
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,481

LEVEL 1

473

32%

LEVEL 2

422

28%

LEVEL 3

363

25%

LEVEL 4

223

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

40

52%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.