Skip to Content
Main content

OSWEGO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

142

40%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

184

36%

LEVEL 2

171

33%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

82

44%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

124

39%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

161

35%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

129

30%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

44

77%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

135

39%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

97

54%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

122

48%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

172

35%

LEVEL 2

165

34%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.