Skip to Content
Main content

CENTRAL SQUARE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

400
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 994

LEVEL 1

283

28%

LEVEL 2

311

31%

LEVEL 3

249

25%

LEVEL 4

151

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

509
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,136

LEVEL 1

295

26%

LEVEL 2

332

29%

LEVEL 3

335

29%

LEVEL 4

174

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

128

28%

LEVEL 2

142

31%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

228
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

119

23%

LEVEL 2

167

32%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

155

29%

LEVEL 2

169

32%

LEVEL 3

124

23%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

281
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

176

28%

LEVEL 2

165

27%

LEVEL 3

180

29%

LEVEL 4

101

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

371
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 918

LEVEL 1

254

28%

LEVEL 2

293

32%

LEVEL 3

235

26%

LEVEL 4

136

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

481
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,062

LEVEL 1

270

25%

LEVEL 2

311

29%

LEVEL 3

319

30%

LEVEL 4

162

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 879

LEVEL 1

206

23%

LEVEL 2

284

32%

LEVEL 3

238

27%

LEVEL 4

151

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

491
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 989

LEVEL 1

204

21%

LEVEL 2

294

30%

LEVEL 3

319

32%

LEVEL 4

172

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

77

67%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

91

62%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

168

31%

LEVEL 3

157

29%

LEVEL 4

119

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

343
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

97

16%

LEVEL 2

177

29%

LEVEL 3

205

33%

LEVEL 4

138

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

185

41%

LEVEL 2

143

32%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

198

38%

LEVEL 2

155

30%

LEVEL 3

130

25%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

399
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 987

LEVEL 1

279

28%

LEVEL 2

309

31%

LEVEL 3

248

25%

LEVEL 4

151

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

505
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,123

LEVEL 1

290

26%

LEVEL 2

328

29%

LEVEL 3

332

30%

LEVEL 4

173

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.