J E LANIGAN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

43

39%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

52

36%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

71

32%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

24

69%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

24

75%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

44

34%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

63

48%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.