ALLEN CREEK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

83

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

88

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

45

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

46

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

38

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

42

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

59

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

15

11%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

66

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

83

47%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

87

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

133
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

79

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

87

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

80

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

86

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.