NORTHSIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

99

24%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

98

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

105

22%

LEVEL 3

176

37%

LEVEL 4

123

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

68

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

210
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

87

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

261
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

94

23%

LEVEL 3

154

38%

LEVEL 4

107

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

92

24%

LEVEL 3

136

36%

LEVEL 4

98

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

98

22%

LEVEL 3

170

38%

LEVEL 4

121

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

85

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

262
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

150

39%

LEVEL 4

112

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

42

42%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

36

38%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.