Skip to Content
Main content

FOSTERTOWN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

47

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

37

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

38

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

23

42%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

91

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

89

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

91

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

180
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

91

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

62

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

60

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

173
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

90

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

89

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.