GAMS HIGH TECH MAGNET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

171

61%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

129

48%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

87

63%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

59

44%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

84

59%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

70

52%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

46

78%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

108

55%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

81

43%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

126

54%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

45

92%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

105

60%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

66

62%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

19
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

49

48%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

19

58%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

152

61%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

115

48%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

156

60%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

114

47%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.