Skip to Content
Main content

CORNWALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

88

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

85

41%

LEVEL 4

80

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

45

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

38

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

43

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

47

43%

LEVEL 4

42

38%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

51

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

54

45%

LEVEL 4

46

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

20

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

88

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

80

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

88

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

84

42%

LEVEL 4

78

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

75

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

73

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

18

50%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

149
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

87

43%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

155
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

81

42%

LEVEL 4

74

39%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.