VICTOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

110

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

75

20%

LEVEL 3

148

40%

LEVEL 4

111

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

56

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

87

45%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

58

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

97

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

128

41%

LEVEL 4

100

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

107

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

138

44%

LEVEL 4

108

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

30

50%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

230
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

110

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

259
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

148

41%

LEVEL 4

111

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

48

16%

LEVEL 3

127

43%

LEVEL 4

99

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

24

32%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.