PHELPS-CLIFTON SPRINGS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

156

29%

LEVEL 2

183

34%

LEVEL 3

139

26%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

181

33%

LEVEL 2

185

33%

LEVEL 3

132

24%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

79

30%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

137

28%

LEVEL 2

161

33%

LEVEL 3

127

26%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

157

32%

LEVEL 2

165

33%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

171

38%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

101

22%

LEVEL 2

169

37%

LEVEL 3

129

28%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

67

77%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

80

80%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

197
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

146

28%

LEVEL 2

181

35%

LEVEL 3

139

27%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

187
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

172

32%

LEVEL 2

184

34%

LEVEL 3

131

24%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

100

39%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.