Skip to Content
Main content

MIDLAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

111

27%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

117

29%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

45

74%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

53

79%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

101

26%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

109

28%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

72

36%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

76

39%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.