CANANDAIGUA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

179

31%

LEVEL 3

144

25%

LEVEL 4

154

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

102

18%

LEVEL 2

158

27%

LEVEL 3

199

34%

LEVEL 4

120

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

84

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

177
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

70

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

143

29%

LEVEL 3

132

27%

LEVEL 4

139

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

291
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

81

16%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

186

37%

LEVEL 4

105

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

137

28%

LEVEL 4

153

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

129

26%

LEVEL 3

197

40%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

52

59%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

55

63%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

319
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

97

17%

LEVEL 2

157

27%

LEVEL 3

199

35%

LEVEL 4

120

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

123

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

143

40%

LEVEL 4

92

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.