Skip to Content
Main content

MEACHEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

127

60%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

131

70%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

61

60%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

65

70%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

66

61%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

66

69%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

83

63%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

85

73%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

87

52%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

92

65%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

40

91%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

39

85%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

109

64%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

117

75%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

117

59%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

124

70%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.