Skip to Content
Main content

SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

97

19%

LEVEL 3

217

42%

LEVEL 4

168

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

101

19%

LEVEL 3

164

31%

LEVEL 4

220

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

113

47%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

110

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

52

18%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

101

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

110

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

370
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

93

19%

LEVEL 3

208

41%

LEVEL 4

162

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

373
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

96

19%

LEVEL 3

157

30%

LEVEL 4

216

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

380
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

85

17%

LEVEL 3

213

44%

LEVEL 4

167

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

89

18%

LEVEL 3

156

32%

LEVEL 4

217

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

24

51%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

345
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

76

17%

LEVEL 3

188

42%

LEVEL 4

157

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

335
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

83

19%

LEVEL 3

140

31%

LEVEL 4

195

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

25

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.