Skip to Content
Main content

ONONDAGA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

56

36%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

32

24%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

49

37%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.