Skip to Content
Main content

DONALD S RAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

114

19%

LEVEL 2

189

31%

LEVEL 3

184

30%

LEVEL 4

126

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

165

26%

LEVEL 2

167

26%

LEVEL 3

200

31%

LEVEL 4

109

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

73

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

280
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

92

17%

LEVEL 2

171

31%

LEVEL 3

169

31%

LEVEL 4

111

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

137

24%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

188

34%

LEVEL 4

89

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

67

12%

LEVEL 2

174

32%

LEVEL 3

183

33%

LEVEL 4

123

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

147

27%

LEVEL 3

197

36%

LEVEL 4

109

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

47

71%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

67

74%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

64

13%

LEVEL 2

141

29%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

114

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

271
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

178

39%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

94

51%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.