WESTHILL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

98

17%

LEVEL 2

160

28%

LEVEL 3

196

35%

LEVEL 4

111

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

101

16%

LEVEL 2

156

25%

LEVEL 3

212

34%

LEVEL 4

149

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

201
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

81

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

275
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

170

35%

LEVEL 4

105

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

323
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

122

23%

LEVEL 3

183

35%

LEVEL 4

140

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

192

37%

LEVEL 4

110

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

147

26%

LEVEL 3

208

37%

LEVEL 4

147

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

40

77%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

40

73%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

303
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

96

17%

LEVEL 2

159

28%

LEVEL 3

192

34%

LEVEL 4

111

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

280
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

176

39%

LEVEL 4

104

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

121

25%

LEVEL 3

181

37%

LEVEL 4

142

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

45

41%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.