JAMESVILLE-DEWITT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

475
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

68

10%

LEVEL 2

132

20%

LEVEL 3

220

33%

LEVEL 4

255

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

489
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

115

17%

LEVEL 3

231

35%

LEVEL 4

258

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

112

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

241
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

59

18%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

124

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

66

18%

LEVEL 3

117

32%

LEVEL 4

143

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

248
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

134

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

16

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

18

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

36

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

42

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

364
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

88

18%

LEVEL 3

176

36%

LEVEL 4

188

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

358
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

75

16%

LEVEL 3

174

38%

LEVEL 4

184

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

32

5%

LEVEL 2

116

19%

LEVEL 3

212

35%

LEVEL 4

249

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

95

16%

LEVEL 3

221

36%

LEVEL 4

257

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

471
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

130

20%

LEVEL 3

219

33%

LEVEL 4

252

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

482
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

58

9%

LEVEL 2

111

17%

LEVEL 3

227

35%

LEVEL 4

255

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

412
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

92

17%

LEVEL 3

185

35%

LEVEL 4

227

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

406
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

61

12%

LEVEL 3

178

36%

LEVEL 4

228

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.