GILLETTE ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

460
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

171

21%

LEVEL 2

192

23%

LEVEL 3

268

33%

LEVEL 4

192

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

492
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 884

LEVEL 1

173

20%

LEVEL 2

219

25%

LEVEL 3

287

32%

LEVEL 4

205

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

207
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

253
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

95

21%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

138

31%

LEVEL 4

115

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

283
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

96

20%

LEVEL 2

106

22%

LEVEL 3

164

34%

LEVEL 4

119

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

15

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

15

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

404
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

130

19%

LEVEL 2

161

23%

LEVEL 3

234

34%

LEVEL 4

170

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

426
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 747

LEVEL 1

135

18%

LEVEL 2

186

25%

LEVEL 3

248

33%

LEVEL 4

178

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

111

15%

LEVEL 2

179

24%

LEVEL 3

263

35%

LEVEL 4

188

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 786

LEVEL 1

113

14%

LEVEL 2

195

25%

LEVEL 3

275

35%

LEVEL 4

203

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

60

73%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

60

61%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

392
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

134

22%

LEVEL 3

221

36%

LEVEL 4

171

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

401
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

153

23%

LEVEL 3

225

34%

LEVEL 4

176

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

77

38%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

457
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 818

LEVEL 1

169

21%

LEVEL 2

192

23%

LEVEL 3

265

32%

LEVEL 4

192

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

487
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

168

19%

LEVEL 2

215

25%

LEVEL 3

284

33%

LEVEL 4

203

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.