ROXBORO ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

227

40%

LEVEL 2

164

29%

LEVEL 3

131

23%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

252

42%

LEVEL 2

170

28%

LEVEL 3

118

20%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

123

41%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

108

37%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

129

42%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

167

38%

LEVEL 2

125

28%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

186

40%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

98

21%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

25

64%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

158

33%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

184

36%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

114

22%

LEVEL 4

62

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

69

80%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

68

74%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

217

39%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

240

41%

LEVEL 2

168

29%

LEVEL 3

118

20%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

169

54%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

186

54%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

177
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

210

38%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

238

41%

LEVEL 2

167

29%

LEVEL 3

116

20%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.