WEST GENESEE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

100

23%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

114

26%

LEVEL 2

119

27%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

94

24%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

44

63%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

53

80%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

183
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

99

23%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

80

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

209
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

68

21%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

69

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

46

38%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

207
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

113

26%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

125

29%

LEVEL 4

82

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.