WHITESBORO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

477
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

96

13%

LEVEL 2

155

21%

LEVEL 3

222

30%

LEVEL 4

255

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

584
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 873

LEVEL 1

135

15%

LEVEL 2

154

18%

LEVEL 3

276

32%

LEVEL 4

308

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

125

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

278
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

70

17%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

150

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

238
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

130

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

306
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

84

18%

LEVEL 3

148

32%

LEVEL 4

158

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

13

35%

LEVEL 4

10

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

435
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

78

12%

LEVEL 2

137

21%

LEVEL 3

196

30%

LEVEL 4

239

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

531
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

100

13%

LEVEL 2

137

18%

LEVEL 3

242

32%

LEVEL 4

289

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

454
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

131

22%

LEVEL 3

204

34%

LEVEL 4

250

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

553
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

45

6%

LEVEL 2

119

17%

LEVEL 3

250

35%

LEVEL 4

303

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

75

61%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

90

58%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

474
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

95

13%

LEVEL 2

154

21%

LEVEL 3

221

31%

LEVEL 4

253

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

580
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 863

LEVEL 1

132

15%

LEVEL 2

151

17%

LEVEL 3

274

32%

LEVEL 4

306

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

97

21%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

202

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

425
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

80

15%

LEVEL 3

179

33%

LEVEL 4

246

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

74

23%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.