Skip to Content
Main content

SENATOR JAMES H DONOVAN MIDDLE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

187

48%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

258

42%

LEVEL 2

207

34%

LEVEL 3

106

17%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

73

40%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

114

55%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

125

43%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

37

43%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

68

72%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

93

56%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

41

55%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

66

51%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

140

42%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

164

33%

LEVEL 2

186

38%

LEVEL 3

102

21%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

94

79%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

126

41%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

196

40%

LEVEL 2

159

32%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

61

73%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

62

51%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

25

58%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

162

47%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

243

42%

LEVEL 2

192

33%

LEVEL 3

99

17%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

143
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

255

42%

LEVEL 2

205

34%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.