THOMAS JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

92

39%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

114

39%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

52

40%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

51

39%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

62

38%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

11

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

29

31%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

31

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

33

59%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

40

57%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

26

43%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

38

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

59

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

16

35%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

15

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

101

42%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.