Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN F HUGHES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

116

47%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

121

46%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

50

45%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

51

42%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

66

48%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

70

50%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

22

41%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

45

63%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

51

63%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

25

47%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

26

53%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

82

39%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

83

39%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

34

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

72

43%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

28

36%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

45

64%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

111

49%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.