GENERAL HERKIMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

130

36%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

99

24%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

57

33%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

33

36%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

35

44%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

39

43%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

44

71%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

130
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

179
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

49

68%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

41

60%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

22

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

119

38%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

121

34%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

119

30%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.