HUGH R JONES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

82

35%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

27

36%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

45

47%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

48

41%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

27

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

13

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

32

28%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

30

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

54

38%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

23

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

62

53%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.