SHERRILL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

127

21%

LEVEL 2

190

32%

LEVEL 3

185

31%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 705

LEVEL 1

163

23%

LEVEL 2

207

29%

LEVEL 3

209

30%

LEVEL 4

126

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

69

22%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

276
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

116

20%

LEVEL 2

178

31%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

100

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

320
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

154

23%

LEVEL 2

198

29%

LEVEL 3

201

30%

LEVEL 4

119

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

83

16%

LEVEL 2

177

33%

LEVEL 3

178

33%

LEVEL 4

97

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

99

16%

LEVEL 2

188

31%

LEVEL 3

199

33%

LEVEL 4

124

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

44

66%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

64

67%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

125

34%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

111

33%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

333
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 700

LEVEL 1

162

23%

LEVEL 2

205

29%

LEVEL 3

207

30%

LEVEL 4

126

18%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.