BARKER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

87

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

42

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

45

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

81

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

86

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

35

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

58

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

167
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

85

32%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

168
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

86

32%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.