STARPOINT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

565
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

72

9%

LEVEL 2

195

23%

LEVEL 3

329

40%

LEVEL 4

236

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

547
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 831

LEVEL 1

70

8%

LEVEL 2

214

26%

LEVEL 3

326

39%

LEVEL 4

221

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

263
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

146

38%

LEVEL 4

117

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

247
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

98

26%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

112

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

302
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

183

41%

LEVEL 4

119

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

300
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

191

42%

LEVEL 4

109

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

537
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

62

8%

LEVEL 2

178

23%

LEVEL 3

309

40%

LEVEL 4

228

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

517
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 763

LEVEL 1

56

7%

LEVEL 2

190

25%

LEVEL 3

307

40%

LEVEL 4

210

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

541
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

40

5%

LEVEL 2

168

22%

LEVEL 3

311

42%

LEVEL 4

230

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

524
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 748

LEVEL 1

36

5%

LEVEL 2

188

25%

LEVEL 3

309

41%

LEVEL 4

215

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

34

41%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

488
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

142

21%

LEVEL 3

280

42%

LEVEL 4

208

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

481
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

31

5%

LEVEL 2

176

26%

LEVEL 3

280

41%

LEVEL 4

201

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.